Deontology vs utilitarianism

Thus, consequentiality becomes very important in this school of thought.

Utilitarianism vs. Deontology

John Stuart Mill What is Deontology? The stress is laid on the end that the means, of getting there, becomes only secondary. Thus, we should always look to the ends rather than the means to determine whether an Deontology vs utilitarianism is ethical or not.

The other option is to do nothing and watch the villain kill all ten people. But basically, a utilitarian approach to morality implies that no moral act e. It is the morality of an action that can determine the morality of its outcome. But these acts are clearly immoral regardless of how fruitful they might be for the greatest number.

Second, humans should be treated as objects of intrinsic moral value; that is, as ends in themselves and never as a mere means to some other end say, overall happiness or welfare. Rather, at best, consequences help us determine which action is more in keeping with what is already our duty.

Difference Between Utilitarianism and Deontology

The full pdf can be viewed by clicking here. For example, a doctor may have a duty to benefit a patient, and he or she may need to know what medical consequences would result from various treatments in order to determine what would and would not benefit the patient. They are very different because they take very different approaches to understanding what is good and what is bad.

There is a belief that the philosopher thinks and implements ideas that are more selfish in the utilitarianism school of thought. For example, utilitarianism can be used to justify punishing an innocent man or enslaving a small group of people if such acts produce a maximization of consequences.

Consequences help us find what is our duty, they are not what make something our duty. Deontology says that if the action is not moral in character or nature then the outcome too cannot be moral or ethical. On the other hand, deontology is not consequence-oriented in nature.

This is why one can comment that Utilitarianism does not stress on the code of conduct. This applies even if an act harms an innocent person. Utilitarianism is an ethical system that is most often attributed to philosophers such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham.Ethics Theories- Utilitarianism Vs.

Deontological Ethics There are two major ethics theories that attempt to specify and justify moral rules and principles: utilitarianism and deontological ethics.

Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral [ ]. May 01,  · i have suddenly become rather curious about the 'conflict' after reading this fascinating segment of a post on rhp: "utilitarianism is rather ls like mr.

Get an answer for 'Compare and contrast utilitarian and deontological reasoning.' and find homework help for other Philosophy questions at eNotes. The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important.

Deontology deals with. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics Utilitarianism is a theory of metaethics. This means that it is grounds for what we mean when we say something is good, bad, right or wrong.

This differs from normative ethics, which addresses which things that we encounter in real life are good or bad. DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant ().

Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the .

Deontology vs utilitarianism
Rated 3/5 based on 46 review